As wave of projects begin to sprout, so do disputes
Cross-posted from the Washington Post
Written by Jonathan O’Connell
New apartments and shops are spreading into neighborhoods across the Washington region, with developers looking to capitalize on a better-than-average economy and a massive influx of young adults.
Apartment hunters have wider options, more residents have grocery stores in their neighborhoods and, with dozens of new restaurants and bars, Washington has begun to change its reputation as a gray-suit government town.
Many residents are celebrating the changes. But others aren’t.
And as this new wave of development rises, a chasm between its champions and its skeptics is beginning to show.
In Northeast D.C., Ivy City residents have sued to try to prevent Mayor Vincent C. Gray (D) from relocating a bus depot for dozens of private buses into their neighborhood to make way for upgrades at Union Station.
In Washington Highlands, one of the poorest parts of the District, public housing residents sued the D.C. Housing Authority out of concern that they would be permanently displaced from their homes when their units at Highland Dwellings were refurbished.
It isn’t just the low income or disenfranchised who are fighting back. In Wheaton, residents turned away a mixed-use proposal pushed by Montgomery County Executive Isiah Leggett (D). Residents in Reston have formed an advocacy group, Rescue Reston, and say they have gathered 650 signatures opposing the possible redevelopment of Reston National Golf Course.
There have always been battles between residents and the developers, planners and city officials proposing alterations to neighborhoods. But with the economy gaining steam and apartment construction booming, disputes that faded during the recession are beginning to boil again.
“I think in many ways it’s the same, but now we have many more examples of how these communities are getting screwed over,” said Parisa Norouzi, director of the community organizing group Empower D.C.
‘No trust’
Empower D.C. battled former mayor Adrian M. Fenty’s attempts to close excess schools and lease the buildings to developers, projects that Norouzi said were driven by “gentrification or private profit.” She says those battles have better prepared residents and organizers for disputes such as the bus relocation, which Empower D.C. and residents are fighting in D.C. Superior Court. “At this point, there is really no trust in the process,” she said.
A hearing on the case is expected Tuesday. A Gray spokesman declined to comment.
In other instances, the opponents to zoning changes or development are the well-heeled. Neighborhoods in wealthier parts of Northwest D.C. are raising concerns about parking shortages under proposed changes to the District’s zoning code, while in Reston the concern is a lack of green space should the golf course’s owner try to build a project to capitalize on the construction of two Silver Line Metro stations nearby.
Some Wheaton residents rejected plans to create a mixed-use downtown project because it might resemble the redevelopment of Silver Spring — a success to some but not others. “We know how many small businesses struggled and went out of business in Silver Spring,” Bob Schilke, owner of the Little Bitts Shop of cake supplies, told the Montgomery County Council in February.
Sometimes even the terms used to describe development have have taken on widely different meanings. The D.C. Housing Authority became the envy of other cities in winning seven grants under the federal HOPE VI program, which enabled the District to overhaul blighted public housing projects into mixed-income neighborhoods.
The agency’s renovation of Highland Dwellings, east of Bolling Air Force Base, isn’t a HOPE VI program and no market rate units are even being built. But spokeswoman Dena Michaelson said the agency could have done a better job making that clear to avoid the lawsuit it faced (and since settled).
Where is the unified and city-wide movement to stop unjust displacement, preserve neighborhoods, allow some development and greater financial stability, and assure a healthy mix of folks in DC. Seems groups seem to be working on one property, one parcel, one narrow issue at a time. Who is putting the voice to a proactive(!) not reactive plan to preserve and celebrate the rainbow in DC? Where is that agenda? The economic forces are so great that DC could be extremely different and much much more upscale or Upper East Side in mix in just 20 years.
That agenda must have a plan to realistically move this upcoming generation, or if asking too much tooo soon, the next generations out of poverty, dead end lives, despair. The poorer and less powerful in town need a way to hang on by more than their fingernails, they need some security, opportunity, education, community health. An anchor vs. tide of genrtification, commercialization of life in DC.
When gas hits $7 a gallon or Metro $6 a one-way ride from burbs, when more whites see DC as having less crime, when DC schools improve, when more Baltimoreans realize how very poor and struggling Baltimore is, then the last nail could be in the coffin for a vibrant, mixed income and mixed races District.
Brace yourself suburbs!
A study was done decades ago measuring the perception of “tipping” between blacks and whites. Whites perceived “their” neighborhood tipping black when a lesser percentage of blacks were present. Blacks ‘tolerated’ a higher percentage of whites before thinking their neighborhood was tipping white. Whites are increasingly seeing DC tipping white and upscale and hip. The upscale and hip can also attract non-whites of a certain economic or education level. Once a certain point is reached, even if not 70%, the mindset will shift, “okay, it’s safe (for us) now” or “it’s ours now.”
We seem to already be there in wards 1,2,and 6 and somewhat in 4, and trending some even in 5. Was already so in 3.
What will these folks do in 3-10 years when they start having kids, look to buy a residence, pick a school, examine a commute?
Julia, you make a good point. I would love to see a unified, city-wide movement to stop unjust displacement and preserve neighborhoods. When are you going to start one? No but seriously, as an Empower DC staff person, I have the extreme privilege of being paid to work on many issues. Our active membership is in fact city-wide but made up mostly of folks struggling to get by who can’t commit hours on end to stopping unjust displacement or school closings (which are related by the way). It really takes a lot of energy and commitment to keep one public housing complex from being turned over to private developers or one school from being closed. It’s exhausting.
Gary, I couldn’t agree with you more.