The People’s Soapbox

Empower DC set up the PEOPLE’S SOAPBOX for the first time at last weekend’s Black LUV festival.  In our first edition, Brian Anders has some ideas about how to deal with homelessness and DC’s affordable housing crisis.  Do you agree with him or not? 

Expect more from the PEOPLE’S SOAPBOX soon.

The Greater DC People’s Assembly and Community Media

On May 15, 2010, over 125 local organizers and activists representing a diverse range of issues came together to discuss the state of the local progressive movement and provide a vision for the future.  Participants of the Greater DC People’s Assembly began to create a People’s Agenda, which they brought to the US Social Forum in Detroit for endorsement and action.

Hazal Yolga, an intern with the Washington Peace Center, put together the above video promoting the People’s Assembly.   Hazal took advantage of the free training in video editing (specifically Final Cut Pro) offered by the Grassroots Media Project to any Empower DC member interested in producing media that improves and promotes the self-advocacy of low- and moderate-income DC residents.  Besides being posted here, the video is being sent out over the People’s Assembly listserves and to their Facebook invite groups.

On August 7, the DC People’s Assembly met again to report back on the US Social Forum and to plan their next steps.  In keeping with the goal of bringing together progressive activists to share expertise and work together on overlapping issues, three working groups were formed.

  • The Days of Action planning group is putting together events related to the October 2nd One Nation March.   Contact Ben from Empower DC ben@empowerdc.org for  more information.
  • The People’s Agenda working group is finalizing the list of priorities and collective demands of the DC Metro Social Forum.  To contribute to that discussion contact Anna Duncan of the Latino Economic Development Corporation aduncan@ledcmetro.org.
  • The Community Media working group plans to establish an independent media forum dedicated to the pursuit of social justice.  Greg Bloom from Bread for the City is heading that up and can be reached at greg.bloom@gmail.com.

As the producer of this blog, which I’d like to think is itself a media forum dedicated to the pursuit of social justice, I have joined the community media working group on behalf of the Grassroots Media Project.  In fact there are a number of local media forums dedicated to the pursuit of social justice.  DC’s Independent Media Center and the Washington Peace Center site both have been supporting and reporting activism for well over a decade.   DC Watch is an on-line magazine about politics and public affairs in the District of Columbia.  There are also several smaller sites whose content is dedicated to specific topics.   DC Food for All and Beyond Bread cover issues relating to hunger and poverty in the nation’s capital, Save Our Safety Net covers issues pertaining to social services.  Etc.

The problem is that for most of these blogs, this one included, the content is too specific and the audience too limited to make a substantial impact.  Commercial blogs like DCist and the City Paper have a wide audience but they have no dedication to social justice.  Like the more traditional news sources, commercial blogs and even many of the neighborhood blogs rarely look to DC’s low- and moderate-income residents as experts on the effect that legislation and public policy has on their lives.

Because the Internet has become a powerful way to influence our elected officials, social change activists need to use it.   Although blogs and Youtube videos don’t always reach the low and moderate-income constituents that we social justice advocates work with, they do reach the middle- and high-income residents who hold sway over the city’s political leadership.  Wouldn’t it be sweet if we had a forum with an audience as large as DCist, posting stories that educate DCs progressives about where our issues intersect and empowering our constituents to better advocate for themselves.

To that end the Grassroots DC will provide training in radio and video production to help participants build content for the site that the community media working group is currently calling DC Commons.    The Washington Peace Center has agreed to connect their extensive social justice calendar to the site.  But as of now, there are only a few organizations dedicated to providing content.  We hope to change that at our first meeting,  which is scheduled for Tuesday September 21, at the Empower DC office, 1419 V Street NW.  For more information contact the Grassroots DC coordinator, liane@GrassrootsDC.org.

Covering Education: Tucker vs Nnamdi

Having had parents who put a premium on education and having a daughter myself who is in DCPS, I try to follow what’s going on with the public schools.  I have to admit being greatly disappointed every time Michelle Rhee makes an appearance on WAMU’s Kojo Nnamdi show.  She was on again this last Friday August 28, 2010.  You can find a copy of the transcript at the following link – http://thekojonnamdishow.org/shows/2010-08-27/politics-hour.   A lot of what she says sounds great, but if you’re looking for specifics, you have to wait for a knowledgeable listener to make it on the air with a question.

Michelle Rhee's Great Disapearing Act

Michelle Rhee’s Great Disapearing Act

For example, when Rhee was asked what she would do to improve special education in DCPS she gave a two paragraph answer, but the only specifics she gave came in these two sentences: “We spend upwards of $90 million a year transporting our students to a lot of private schools throughout the region. And we really need to look at what we’re doing to build the capacity within DCPS to serve a lot of those students better, so that they can attend their neighborhood schools.”  So hopefully,  Rhee is gonna ask her people to “look at what they’re doing,” with regard to special education.  That’s reassuring, I guess.

Another caller asked about the drop in AYP test scores, which much of her reform was designed to improve.   Rhee said that despite the fact that test scores have dropped, the huge gap between black and white student achievement has narrowed, has in fact narrowed significantly at the secondary level.  But after looking at the statistics provided by Epsilon, the caller who posed the test score question, I’m wondering how she defines significant.  According to Epsilon, “the most recent scores that came out for AYP shows that 88 percent of the schools in Ward 3 made AYP while 86 percent of the schools in Ward 8 failed. The achievements gap between blacks and whites is even more telling. The lowest achievement level for whites is at Watkins on Capitol Hill, which was 83.78 percent and then it goes up to 95.69 percent at Murch. While in Ward 8, we have Stanton School with the achievement of black — I mean, the achievement level for blacks is 12.72 percent. At Terrell, it’s 28.23 percent. At Savoy, a brand-new school, is 21.62 percent.”

I’m wondering how bad the gap was before the “significant” improvement.  I also wonder if the gap wouldn’t have narrowed further and perhaps without the pain of school closings and teacher firings if Michelle Rhee and the Fenty Administration had taken a look at the funding gap between low-income schools and wealthier schools.  I know that schools in DC are funded on a per pupil basis, but some pupils cost more to educate than others.  No doubt, a look at the individual school budgets will verify this.  Special education and special needs students, as Rhee herself seems to be aware, cost the city a significant amount of money in transportation alone.  So what does it mean when these students attend low-income schools at a higher rate than wealthier schools?   As far as I know, DC public schools don’t get more money for students that require specialized instruction.

How the city deals with special education students isn’t the only thing that contributes to the achievement gap between black and white students, but it is one thing that Rhee doesn’t seem to know a whole lot about.  What else is she missing?  Kojo Nnamdi and his guest analyst Tom Sherwood seemed more concerned about whether or not Rhee would stay on the job if Mayor Fenty loses his re-election bid.  (Sounds like the answer is no by the way.)  Neither of them questioned her about the controversies at Bruce Monroe or Hardy Elementary Schools.  They praised the physical renovations taking place in schools on Capital Hill, but no mention was made of other schools, like Parkview Elementary (which currently houses students from the recently demolished Bruce Monroe) continue to deal with rodent infestations in the food supply.   Rhee’s answers sounded like those of a politician, rather than an educational professional with an intricate understanding of the system she hopes to reform.

On the other hand, if you do in fact want to hear an educational professional willing to give detailed analysis and an honest assessment of the DC public school system, the place to turn would have to be WPFW.  Reporter Pete Tucker interviewed former DCPS teacher James Boutin about his experience within the system.  I have heard very little in the mainstream press about how many teachers and administrators are leaving DCPS voluntarily.  We are meant to believe that the answers to DCPS’ problems lay in the youthful idealism of the Teach for America protege.   According to Boutin, school reform under Michelle Rhee is not exactly sunshine and light, even for those within the system who desperately want reform.  Anyone with an interest in the DCPS should hear this interview, and so I have reposted it here:  Rhee’s Great Disappearing Act

Pete Tucker is not only reporting for WPFW, he has started his own blog Fight Back Radio where his audio podcasts are archived.  The link is thefightback.org.