D.C. Public Schools 2015 Year In Review

The following is taken from the January 2016 edition of the Citizen Reader, a newsletter published by Grassroots DC Education Contributor Sarah Livingston.  Sarah Livingston is a native of Mississippi who ardently believes that democracy is the best thing we have going for us in America and that good, helpful information is essential to the most inclusive and most equal participation of *all* citizens in it.  From that belief, Livingview Communications–A Citizens Information Service was born. *Citizen Reader* is LVC’s third project since 2004.

Citizen Reader Header Jan 2016

Review of 2015:
A revealing year in the governance of DC’s public schools

2015 opened with a new Mayor and a Council down by two seats due to the election of former Ward 4 Councilmember Muriel Bowser to the Mayor’s office, and the passing away of former Ward 8 Councilmember, Marion Barry. The 2014 election also changed the Committee on Education as the former chair, David Catania, lost his bid for mayor and his seat on the Council. At-large Councilmember and previous member of the committee, David Grosso, was appointed in his place.

10,000 students suspended or expelled from DC’s public schools in one year
A 2014 report by the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE) revealed this number and that it included the youngest students in the schools, the 3 and 4 year olds in the pre-k programs. Bill 21-0001, The Pre-K Student Discipline Amendment Act of 2015, was introduced in the Council on January 6 to prohibit the suspension or expulsion of 3 and 4 year olds from school and became Law 21-0012, effective June 23, 2015.

“By fourth grade, nearly 50 percent of Black and Latino males are reading below grade level”
That is one point made in the press release of the Mayor’s launching of the Empowering Males of Color initiative on January 21. The press release goes on to reveal that “nearly seventy percent of all males in DC ages 5 to 24 are Black and Latino,” that “43 percent of the DCPS student body is composed of Black and Latino males,” that “Black males are the least satisfied with school, with satisfaction rates 16 percentage points lower than the district’s most satisfied students,” and that “despite recent gains, Black and Latino males are still graduating at rates lower than their peers: 48 and 57 percent respectively.” These points are not grouped in the press release as they are here but scattered throughout the document. www.mayor.dc.gov.

Politico puts Pearson in the spotlight
A report by Stephanie Simon in the Politico newspaper of February 10, “No Profit Left Behind,” revealed that Pearson, a British based for-profit education publishing company, has done very well during the years of the No Child Left Behind federal education law. By her account, “Half of its $8 billion in annual global sales comes from its North American education division.” She writes that it has a broad range of endeavors from K-12 through higher education. While much of it is in testing, it also includes “diagnosing and treating attention deficit disorder,” and writing on-line courses, including the assessments, for colleges, both non-profit and for-profit. It is involved with the Common Core State Standards and, she writes, “It co-owns the for-profit company that now administers the GED.”

DCPS chancellor receives pay raise
The Chancellor of the District Public Schools Salary Adjustment Act of 2015 was introduced in the Council on February 19 proposing to raise the chancellor’s salary to $284,000 a year. The measure was approved by the Council and became Law 21-0004.

Once more on at-risk funding
The At-risk Funding Temporary Amendment Act of 2015 was introduced on February 27 to direct the chancellor to allocate at-risk funds in consultation with principals and Local School Advisory Teams (LSATs) and to make an annual report “that explains the allocation of funds sorted by schools.” That became Law 21-0007.

The elected school Board lacks authority
The DC State Board of Education President, Jack Jacobson, who is also the Ward 2 representative on the Board, testified at an Agency Performance Oversight hearing on March 6 to several “Areas of Critical Need.” First he said is “the State Board’s lack of authority to initiate consideration and adoption of policy initiatives for issues already within the Board’s jurisdiction.” He stated that the Board is blocked in several policy areas, such as revising the district’s graduation requirements, due to that lack of authority, and concluded, “our current structure, [which is] unlike any other State Board in the country, should be changed” to “benefit students, families, and the over-all policy consideration process.” Read more of the testimony at www.sboe.dc.gov/testimony

Public Charter School Board recommends amendment to DC Code
On March 17, the DC Auditor’s office released a report, Oversight Improvements Must Continue to Ensure Accountability in Use of Public Funds by D.C. Public Charter Schools stating that “The audit was conducted as a result of the fiscal year 2013 annual risk assessment.” On page 13, the report says, “To assist in its oversight of public charter schools that contract with for-profit entities, the PCSB is recommending an amendment to the D.C. Code to require for-profit “charter management organizations” to disclose the same level of financial information as now required of other, not-for-profit management firms based on their exemption under state and federal tax law.” www.odca.org Report Number: DCA 162015.

Five year summary evaluation of PERAA finds positives and negatives
The Public Education Reform Amendment Act of 2007, the law that gave the mayor control of the schools, required that the law be evaluated after five years and that a determination about continuing or changing the law be made. The report, An Evaluation of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia: Reform in a Changing Landscape, was presented at a Committee on Education Roundtable on June 3. The study was conducted by a committee of the National Research Council which is a part of the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. The reports of the Academies are published by the National Academies Press.

In the Summary of the report, the committee says “The D.C. Council asked the committee to assess
• whether the law’s expectations have been met and whether the changes have led to improved coordination, efficiency, and accountability;
• the extent to which the actions school leaders took were consistent with research and best practices; and
• changes in the conditions for learning in the schools and outcomes for students 7 years after the governance change.”

After they gathered as much information as possible to answer these questions, they analyzed the data and made a number findings. They also offered a number of recommendations. At the same time the report was presented to the Committee on Education, the National Academies Press released a Report Brief on-line showing the findings and recommendations. Those are shown below, but even more briefly than the Report Brief.

In their briefest form, the findings are:
• Some improvements in operations, but oversight and coordination fall short
• Efforts to improve teacher quality show progress, disparities
• Learning conditions and student performance show improvement, but disparities persist

And the recommendations are:
• Address disparities
• Develop a comprehensive data warehouse
• Support on-going evaluation of the DC educational system

The full report is online at www.nap/edu and is free to read or download. It can also be purchased at the National Academies bookstore on the first floor of the Keck Center at 500 Fifth Street, NW.

DCPS food service operations–an example of ‘poor oversight and coordination’?
On June 5 media reports of a settlement for $19 million between DCPS and its contracted food service provider, Chartwells, revealed longstanding problems with oversight and management of the contract. The settlement was the result of a whistleblower lawsuit brought by the former DCPS food Service director, Jeffrey Mills, who was fired in 2013 for bringing the contract’s problems to the attention of DCPS leaders. After it settled, Chartwells said it wanted to withdraw from the contract but DCPS was not prepared to replace them on the short notice Chartwells gave and decided to continue the contract until 2017, its original expiration date, saying that the problems in the contract had been solved. See Washington Post, June 5, “DC Schools vendor pays $19 million to settle whistleblower lawsuit” for more and links to other Post articles on the subject over the years.

“Currently, the District does not have a process in place for selecting schools for modernization.”
The above quote is from the July 1 DC Auditor’s report entitled The District’s School Modernization Program Has Failed to Comply with the DC Code and Lacks Accountability, Transparency and Basic Financial Management. Through a very detailed look at the operations of the Department of General Services (DGS) and its predecessor, the Office of Public Education

Facilities Modernization (OPEFM), during the school years from 2011 through 2013, this report shows that the program has moved far off course from its inception in 2006 with passage of the Schools Modernization Financing Act of that year. It raises concern about the relationship between these government entities and the private partnership of McKissack & McKissack and Brailsford & Dunleavey known as the DC Partners for the Revitalization of Education Projects, LLC (DC PEP), among other concerns. It clarifies that responsibility for writing the Master Education Facilities Plan is in the office of the Deputy Mayor for Education. It makes twenty-one recommendations that would improve accountability of public funds and provides information on the cost-per-school projects in FY 2010 through 2013. Report number: DCA 282015 at www.dcauditor.org

Mayor Bowser’s “6 Month Progress Report”
Mayor Bowser’s report on the first six months of her administration revealed much activity in all areas of the government. In the section on Education, the report says “Our schools are on an upward trajectory, but we know we can do more. That is why the Mayor is accelerating reform. 

• An additional $31.4 million for increased enrollment in traditional public schools and public charter schools
• $20 million designated over three years for the Empowering Males of Color initiative at DCPS. • $76 million over six years for neighborhood libraries
• Advanced $185 million by two years for a new, central library
• And invested $7 million to expand the Kids Ride Free program to Metrorail from the Mayor’s bus fare program.”

In a different section of the report, several other actions are listed:
• Launched dual enrollment program allowing Banneker Sr. High School students to take classes at Howard University
• Finalized Student Assignment Plan to allow for cross-park and cross-river school access • Launched the first DC Public Library at a charter school and at the DC Jail
• Planned two new Career Academies: Hospitality at Ballou HS and Public Safety at Anacostia HS

Summer reports shed light on student mobility and charter school finances
• In July: Mid-Year Student Movement in DC from OSSE’s Division of Data, Accountability, and

Research is an update and expansion of its first report on this subject to include school years 12/13 and 13/14. One of their findings is that 92 percent of students, traditional and charter, remain in the school they enrolled in at the beginning of the school year through to the end of the school year. The other 7.8% (6,118) move in five different ways. www.osse.dc.gov

• On August 5, the DC Fiscal Policy Institute issued A look At Public Charter School Finances: Revenue and Spending per Student by Thu Pham. This report analyzes the Financial Audit Review (FAR) that the Public Charter School Board conducts every year on the financial health of each charter school. The Far report is at http://www.livebinders.com/play/play?id=1720593 and the DC Fiscal Policy Institute’s analysis at www.dcfpi.org

“500 DCPS teachers replaced just this year”
In a departure from previous years, DCPS chancellor Henderson took to the stage at Dunbar High School on September 29 to be interviewed by Jim Vance of News Channel 4 about the “State of Schools” rather than giving an address. A publication of the Howard University’s School of Communications, District Chronicles, headlined its October 8 report on the event “A worthy school district; Despite statistics, Chancellor Henderson gives upbeat State of the Schools address” In the article, Sope Aluko writes that at one point, “Mr. Vance noted that one in four DC Public Schools got a new principal at the beginning of the year and DCPS hired 750 new teachers, replacing 500 just this year.” Ms. Henderson responded, “There is a paradigm where everyone works and stays where they are…that’s not always the case. We have had a number of people who go on to other jobs, some have been promoted or we told them that DCPS was not the right fit for them.” www.disrictchronicles.com

Charter school lawsuit concerning per pupil funding to continue
A Memorandum Opinion was issued on September 30 in case No. 14-cv-1293 (TSC) that was brought against the DC government by two charter schools and the DC Association of Chartered Public Schools in the US District Court for the District of Columbia in July, 2014. The Plaintiffs allege that the DC government doesn’t fund charter schools equally with the DCPS schools and they use three arguments to make their case. The Defendants responded with a Motion to Dismiss. In the Opinion, the Judge granted the dismissal of one of the three Counts but not the other two. The case will continue into 2016 when, among other things, a Status Conference has been set for February 16, 2016 at 10:15 am in Courtroom 2 before Judge Tanya S. Chutkan according to the Court’s online records database at the Courthouse.

A refresher on the meaning of ‘public’ is found needed, and provided
Posts on educationdc.net, a blog launched in early September by a parent and public school advocate, kept readers apprised on the filing of a complaint about the new Deputy Mayor for Education’s announcement on August 17 to establish a Cross-Sector Collaboration Task Force that would, among other things, hold meetings that would be “closed to the public.” The complaint was filed with the Board of Ethics and Accountability (BEGA)’s Office of Open Government on August 31. The OOG issued a “binding opinion” on October 7 clarifying that the task force is a public body as defined in the Open Meetings Act and must comply with the Act’s provisions. See http://educationdc.net for the posts and a link to the opinion letter or visit www.open-dc.gov Complaint #OOG-002_8.31.15 under the Complaints Resolved Category.

Are charter schools public or not?
The Committee on Education held a hearing on October 14 to receive testimony on B21-0115, the Public Charter School Fiscal Transparency Amendment Act of 2015. One member of the public testified that, “The first thing you could do is to classify these schools that are being funded with public dollars as public schools. I was astounded to read in the DC Code that:

(12) District of Columbia public school—

(A) In general—The term “District of Columbia public school” means a public school in the District of Columbia that offers classes:

(i) At any of the grade levels from prekindergarten through grade 12; or

(ii) Leading to a secondary school diploma, or its recognized equivalent.
(B) Exception—The term “District of Columbia public school” does not include a public

charter school.”

The above quoted part of the DC Code comes from Chapter 18 § 38-1800.02 Definitions. It makes a similar exception in defining the District of Columbia Government saying at (10)(B) “Exception.—The term “District of Columbia Government” neither includes the Authority nor a public charter school.” The DC Code can be read at www.dccouncil.us/dccode

Statement of caution on the use of Value Added Models

The American Educational Research Association issued a statement on November 11 advising caution “in the use of VAM for high-stakes testing.” The AERA, along with the American Psychological Association and the National Council on Measurement in Education, publishes the Standards for Education and Psychological Testing, considered the gold standard in guidance on testing. This statement followed a special issue of the AERA’s magazine, “Educational Researcher” in March 2015 focused solely on the topic of VAM. www.aera.net/newsroom

Washington City Paper finds a “Shadow Chancellor”
Jeffrey Anderson, in the December 11 issue, brought some of the background activity in school reform to the light of day and made a case that it is not the officially appointed DCPS chancellor who calls the shots in DC’s schools, rather District resident Katherine Bradley, head of the City Bridge Foundation and secretary of the Federal City Council, among many other activities, but is not an elected or appointed official in the DC government the author reports.

Long time, no contract see
The Washington Teacher blog reported on December 14, that DC teachers’ last contract expired in 2012. She writes that many were led to believe a proposal would be presented in December and disappointed when nothing materialized. www.thewashingtonteacher.blogspot.com

Editor’s note: Going forward, we will be looking into why it is that “By fourth grade, nearly 50 percent of Black and Latino males are reading below grade level.” If true, is it a failure in governance or something else? How can it be corrected, as it surely must be!

Citizen Reader is a project of Livingview Communications—a citizens’ information service that is dedicated to the preservation and enhancement of democracy and the honor of all who have fought and died to equally participate in and protect it.

Sarah Livingston, Publisher & Editor
202-207-8441
Ess.livingston@gmail.com
To subscribe to a PDF version by email, send your name and email address to the editor. Paper copies are available in the DC Public Libraries.

A Short History of D.C. Public Schools

The following is taken from the first edition of the Citizen Reader, a newsletter published by Grassroots DC Education Contributor Sarah Livingston.  The article explains the governing history of District of Columbia Public Schools–how we went from a system segregated by race and controlled by an appointed board of trustees, to a system segregated by traditional public schools and charters, controlled by the mayor.  Citizen Reader Banner

An Act of Congress, passed December 5, 1804 authorized the District of Columbia “to establish and endow a permanent institution for the education of youth in the city of Washington.” President Thomas Jefferson personally contributed $200 towards the endowment of the schools and was rewarded by being named the first president of the thirteen-member Board of Trustees. Under Jefferson’s chairmanship, the Board aspired to create a primary and secondary school system, as well as a university.

Photo of Charles Sumner School opened in 1872 for black children, now a museum and archives.

Photo of Charles Sumner School opened in 1872
for black children, now a museum and archives.

The idealist intent of the governing body was to provide for the education of children whose parents were unable to pay for the tuition at private schools. This was to be accomplished with a meager $1,500, procured through the proceeds of taxes laid on dogs, licenses from carriages and hacks, ordinaries and taverns, “spirituous” liquors and the like. In 1806, the first two schools— Eastern Free School (east of the Capitol) and Western School (one-half mile from the President’sHouse)—were opened.  Due to this limited budget and to the stigma of being regarded as“charity” schools, however, the public system grew slowly and developed little. Indeed, in its first century of existence, the schools, despite opening up to more affluent “paying” students, were still poorly regarded and housed in makeshift quarters such as old market houses, fraternal halls, church basements and other structures. The conditions were so inferior that the members of the Board of Trustees were mortified to show their counterparts from other cities.

Schools for African Americans were founded almost simultaneously, in 1807, but under the sponsorship of private citizens and religious groups. The earliest black schools were generally quartered in church basements and other black institutional buildings. In 1835, in response to the Nat Turner uprisings and the related “Snow Riots,” the education of African Americans suffered a serious setback as their educational facilities were attacked and destroyed. Many of these schools were later revived. In 1851, Myrtilla Miner, a white pioneer in the education of African Americans, established one of the city’s first high schools for black women.

Over the years, Congress established, reorganized and abolished many forms of local governing. Through them all the Board of Trustees operated continuously. In 1967, after more than ninety years of District governing by an appointed three member Commission, President Lyndon Johnson established a Mayor-Commissioner and Council government, all appointed. One year later, in 1968, Congress made the Board of Trustees into an elected body. This resulted in a government with an appointed Mayor and Council members while the Board of Education was elected. That continued until the Home Rule Charter was passed in 1973 establishing the present form of local government.

The Home Rule Charter, among other things, made the Mayor and the Council elected offices, defined their powers and included the Board of Education along with four other “independent” agencies. As pointed out in an American University Law School Journal analysis of 1975, how the Mayor, Council and Board were to relate to each other was left ‘ambiguous’ in some specifics during the somewhat hurried writing of the Charter in Congress.

In 1995, with input from a group of DC residents, Congress passed the School Reform Act in the Appropriations Bill. It established a plan for reform of DCPS and for the creation of chartered schools in DC, how they are authorized and the establishment of the Per Pupil Funding Formula, among other details.

In response to the city’s near bankruptcy in 1996, Congress established the Financial Responsibility and
Management Assistance Authority, also known as the “control board,” which suspended much of the local government’s powers. It included establishment of a Board of Trustees to act in place of, with some consultation, the Board of Education.

In 2000, then Mayor Anthony Williams was given authority, through a Referendum, to appoint four of the nine members of the Board of Education.

In 2007, DC became the ninth of about a dozen cities that have instituted “mayoral control” of their public school districts since 1992. This occurred with the passage of the Public Education Reform Amendment Act of 2007, but without a Referendum. The act was introduced by then Mayor Adrian Fenty in the first few days of his administration, with support of nine of the eleven Councilmembers, and by that June, it was the law. The Board of Education that had existed from 1804 until then was abolished and the Mayor was given all its powers and authorities.

One of the many provisions of PERAA is that it be evaluated by a third party and “A determination as to whether sufficient progress in public education has been achieved to warrant continuation of the provisions and requirements of this act or whether a new law, and a new system of education, should be enacted by the District government.”

In June this year, the National Research Council, the independent party chosen by the DC Council to conduct the evaluation, funded for $325,000, released its report, An Evaluation of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia: Reform in a Changing Landscape. It is available to read or download at no cost at: www.nap.edu

The Citizen Reader is a project of Livingview Communications–a citizens’ information service dedicated to the preservation and enhancement of democracy and in honor of all who have fought and died to equally participate in and to protect it.   For a complete copy of this issue of the Citizen Reader follow this link.

Adult Education and Family Literacy Week!

In the District of Columbia, we focus a lot of attention on our public and charter schools.  Adult education get much less attention.  But many of DC’s adult learners are products of the District’s public school system.  Listening to their struggles could tell us a lot about what’s missing in DCPS.  So, what follows is an article cross-posted from Southeast Ministry’s blog that details why this issue is important from the point of view of adult learners themselves.  Below that is a flyer that gives details for next week’s Adult Education and Family Literacy Week and lets you know how you can get involved.

Visioning as a Vehicle for Change

1980-01-01 00.00.43On Wednesday, September 9, our learners were led by Samantha Davis, Senior Advocacy and Community Engagement Specialist at So Others Might Eat (S.O.M.E.), in a visioning session that got our learners in a discussion about some of the barriers they face on a daily basis, as well as potential solutions.

Some of the barriers that were mentioned by our learners included affordable housing, transportation, homelessness, child care, and violence in the communities they live. Other barriers that were identified by SEM learners were access to more educational programs and the fact that the new GED exam is computer-based. Another barrier that was identified was time, specifically the times that certain programs begin and end, since adult learners are often fitting their education around their work schedules that often change.

To address the barriers that were named, SEM learners brainstormed possible solutions. There was a great deal of discussion around the possibility of having more computer training available for adult learners who do not have the sufficient computer skills necessary to complete the new computer-based GED exam. The class also discussed the idea of having transportation designed specifically for adult learners to programs throughout the District, in order reduce the burden of having to find their own way to classes.

For information regarding donating to Southeast Ministry, our programs, or volunteering, please visit. www.southeastministrydc.org, or call 202-562-2636.

Download pdf of flyer HERE.

Adult Education and Family Literacy Week

Child Trauma and Education with DC Activist Stuart Anderson

Cross-Posted from The Education Town Hall
Written By Virginia Spatz

Nearly half of all children in the United States have experienced trauma, according to recent research. Children in underserved communities face trauma at a higher rate and are more likely to experience repeated trauma or more than one type.

Gun violence persistently affects students and families in many neighborhoods in cities like Washington, DC, with an uptick in incidents and related stress this summer, for example. Families in St. Louis, MO, were gassed last night as part of police response to protests, and students around the country have experienced similar stresses. In some areas, children experience trauma relating to natural disasters or fires. Episodic or chronic financial trouble, homelessness, domestic violence, and other factors also traumatize many children.

Results include attendance, behavioral, and academic problems. But research indicates that trauma-sensitive school environments can help students recover and thrive. Collaborations across the fields of education, psychology, law, and neurobiology have helped create policy and practice addressing this serious and common problem.

National Response and Resources

Several jurisdictions have taken steps to mandate and support trauma-sensitive or trauma-informed schools. In addition, a suit arguing that schools must address trauma like any other special need is moving through the federal courts

TraumaPictureLast August, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts enacted a “Safe and Supportive Schools” boosting the trauma-informed schools movement. Trauma-sensitive practices are also at work in Washington state and in San Francisco. In addition, the District of Columbia’s City Council held a roundtable on the topic in June.

At the time of the hearing, DC Children’s Law Center released a report Addressing Childhood Trauma in DC Schools. (CLC — Addressing Childhood Trauma in DC Schools–June 2015.) National organizations, including the Trauma and Learning Policy Institute and the National Child Traumatic Stress Network, offer extensive research and resources for educators and policymakers. (See Washington Post “Trauma is hidden cause of academic struggles for many in DC, report finds.”)

Today, in Los Angeles, a federal judge is scheduled to consider several motions in the landmark case known as “Peter P., et al. v. Compton Unified School District, et al.” The suit was filed earlier this year by five student-plaintiffs who have experienced severe trauma and argue that Compton Unified School District (CUSD) failed to address their needs. Three teachers joined the suit, saying that CUSD has not given them the tools and support they need to appropriately assist children experiencing severe trauma. Here is the case timeline, with links to more details.

Here is NCTSN’s Child Trauma Tool Kit for Educators and more at “Readiness, Response, and Recovery” resources. The Trauma and Learning Policy Initiative offers many free resources (although they do request a donation from those who can): Visit their site for free downloads of Helping Traumatize Children Learn and Creating and Advocating for Trauma-Sensitive Schools and much more.

Need for Street Response Units

Stuart Anderson, founder and director of Family and Friends of Incarcerated People, joined the Education Town Hall on August 20 to discuss the need for on-site trauma response units to help children cope with violent incidents. He argues for such units on the streets of DC and other cities. Listen to Track below —

Chicago Public School Layoffs and Dyett High School Disinvestment on Education Town Hall 8-13-15 by Education_Town_Hall on Mixcloud

The Bottom Line on Mayoral Control of DCPS

It was a very welcome sight to this citizen’s eyes to read Grassroots DC’s announcement a few weeks ago about the report on mayoral control of the schools—An Evaluation of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia: Reform in a Changing Landscape.  Especially since the report has received far, far less attention in the other media than passing the law that gave the mayor control, the Public Education Reform Amendment Act (PERAA), did in 2007. The reasons for this difference in attention may have something to do with the fact that those who benefit from mayoral control probably aren’t so keen to have a report that shows several deficiencies in this form of school governance widely known amongst the public.

The saddest, but probably not the most surprising, finding the report makes is that in all the schools together, DCPS and charters, 49.9% of the 70,000 plus students are proficient or above in reading and 54.4% proficient or above in math. That means that about half the students in the two systems, some 35,000 of the city’s children and teenagers, have basic or below basic skills in two of the most important things they need to know in order to continue learning.

Without acquiring these skills in the early grades, kindergarten up to third or fourth grade, children are seriously impaired in their ability to go further in their learning and stay on grade level or better. Catching up is hard to do and even harder in schools that aren’t providing these students with what they need to learn the basics in the first place, much less catch up when they do fall behind. But mayoral control has put people in charge of DCPS who don’t seem to know what’s needed and even when the Council increased funds for “at-risk” kids in 2013, spent the money on other things.

Meanwhile, the charter schools have gained a reputation for finding ways to eliminate students who have fallen behind, which helps their reading and math scores look somewhat better—51.4% in reading and 59.6% in math—than the city-wide average shown above.  But still, and especially with all the talk of charter school’s superiority and the charter school Board approving one charter after another, many of which go to people who don’t come from DC but are funded by DC taxpayers, these figures from the Evaluation are the “bottom line” of what mayoral control has added up to in its eight years.

This is a painfully telling finding especially to the honest who’ve been going along with it in a good faith effort to give it a try. And, perhaps, it’s a “bottom line” that those benefiting from mayoral control would rather not get much, if any, attention.