The Bottom Line on Mayoral Control of DCPS

It was a very welcome sight to this citizen’s eyes to read Grassroots DC’s announcement a few weeks ago about the report on mayoral control of the schools—An Evaluation of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia: Reform in a Changing Landscape.  Especially since the report has received far, far less attention in the other media than passing the law that gave the mayor control, the Public Education Reform Amendment Act (PERAA), did in 2007. The reasons for this difference in attention may have something to do with the fact that those who benefit from mayoral control probably aren’t so keen to have a report that shows several deficiencies in this form of school governance widely known amongst the public.

The saddest, but probably not the most surprising, finding the report makes is that in all the schools together, DCPS and charters, 49.9% of the 70,000 plus students are proficient or above in reading and 54.4% proficient or above in math. That means that about half the students in the two systems, some 35,000 of the city’s children and teenagers, have basic or below basic skills in two of the most important things they need to know in order to continue learning.

Without acquiring these skills in the early grades, kindergarten up to third or fourth grade, children are seriously impaired in their ability to go further in their learning and stay on grade level or better. Catching up is hard to do and even harder in schools that aren’t providing these students with what they need to learn the basics in the first place, much less catch up when they do fall behind. But mayoral control has put people in charge of DCPS who don’t seem to know what’s needed and even when the Council increased funds for “at-risk” kids in 2013, spent the money on other things.

Meanwhile, the charter schools have gained a reputation for finding ways to eliminate students who have fallen behind, which helps their reading and math scores look somewhat better—51.4% in reading and 59.6% in math—than the city-wide average shown above.  But still, and especially with all the talk of charter school’s superiority and the charter school Board approving one charter after another, many of which go to people who don’t come from DC but are funded by DC taxpayers, these figures from the Evaluation are the “bottom line” of what mayoral control has added up to in its eight years.

This is a painfully telling finding especially to the honest who’ve been going along with it in a good faith effort to give it a try. And, perhaps, it’s a “bottom line” that those benefiting from mayoral control would rather not get much, if any, attention.

Town Hall Meetings on DC Public Schools by Ward

When our elected officials ask for our input, we should give it to them.  So if you have time, please join Councilmember Grosso for community town hall events between June 16 and July 11, 2015. The Councilmember will hold a meeting in each Ward to hear from residents, parents, students, and education stakeholders about public education in the District of Columbia. Below is the schedule for the upcoming town hall events:

Ward 1 Town Hall
Tuesday, June 16, 2015
6:30-8:30 PM
Frank D. Reeves Center
1401 U St. NW
2nd Floor Community Room

Ward 8 Town Hall
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
6:30-8:30 PM
William O. Lockridge/Bellevue Library
115 Atlantic St. SW
Main Meeting Room

Ward 4 Town Hall
Monday, June 29, 2015
6:30-8:30 PM
Petworth Library
4200 Kansas Ave. NW
Meeting Room

Ward 2 Town Hall
Wednesday, July 8, 2015
6:30-8:30 PM
The Charles Sumner School Museum and Archives
1201 17th St NW
Richard L. Hurlbut Memorial Hall

Ward 5 Town Hall
Thursday, June 18, 2015
6:30-8:30 PM
Lamond-Riggs Library
5401 South Dakota Ave. NE
Meeting Room 1

Ward 6 Town Hall
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
6:30-8:30 PM
Southwest Library
900 Wesley Place SW
Meeting Room

Ward 3 Town Hall
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
6:30-8:30 PM
Tenley-Friendship Library
4450 Wisconsin Ave. NW
Large Meeting Room

Ward 7 Town Hall
Saturday, July 11, 2015
10:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Francis A. Gregory Library
3660 Alabama Ave. SE
Meeting Room

In order to best prepare for the community meetings, we are asking that participants sign up  and let us know your concerns. The Councilmember is looking forward to hearing from the community and engaging in these discussions on education issues throughout the District of Columbia.

Evaluating School Reform in the District of Columbia

The National Research Council Makes Its Report, Finally

It feels like forever that DC Public Schools have been known as one of the worst (if not the worst) public school systems in the nation. Low test scores and high dropout rates back up the perception. Twenty years ago, DC School Reform Act of 1995 (a gift from Congress, not a District initiative) gave us charter schools. Many Washingtonians with an investment in the school system (i.e. parents, students, teachers, etc. ) believed that this was the answer. But after ten years, the numbers hadn’t improved—not in the new charters or in the traditional public schools.

In 2007, Mayor Adrian Fenty and his supporters put their money on Michelle Rhee and the Public Education Reform Amendment Act (PERAA). The law gave control of DC Public Schools to the Mayor and more flexibility to administrators like Chancellor Rhee.  To make sure that the changes instituted under PERAA worked, the mayor was required to submit either an independent annual evaluation or a five-year evaluation of the DC public school system. Mayor Fenty chose to go with the five-year assessment, which was due September 15, 2012.   The National Research Council—the independent agency that received the contract to do the evaluation in 2009— has finally completed their 300-page report An Evaluation of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia:  Reform in a Changing Landscape.   On June 3, 2015, the Council of the District of Columbia’s Committee on Education held a public round table to discuss the results.

Surprise! Despite more than eight years of mayoral control, DC’s public schools still have ridiculously low test scores and high dropout rates. The Report states:

 “while there have been some improvements in the public schools of the District of Columbia since a 2007 reform law, significant disparities remain in learning opportunities and academic progress across student groups and the city’s wards.”

Retired math teacher and stalwart DCPS advocate Guy Brandenburg is not impressed with the results.  According to Brandenburg:

“if you care anything about reducing the gaps between achievement levels of white students and those of color, the poor, special ed students, and English language learners (i.e. immigrants), then mayoral control has been a spectacular failure.”

Brandenburg breaks down the numbers in his blog post A Quick Look at the National Academy Report on Mayoral Control of Schools of Washington, DC:  “The gaps between the pass rates on the DC-CAS standardized tests of those groups under mayoral control or the Public Education Reform Amendment Act are enormous and have essentially remained unchanged since 2007, when the law was implemented, according to the data in this report.

Gaps Between Pass Rates - MathGaps Between Pass Rates - Reading

Note that the report combines the data for both the DC public schools and charter schools, combined, at all grade levels, in both reading and math. Here are two graphs, made by me from data in the report, which show the lack of change. …. HIGH NUMBERS ARE BAD because they show large gaps in proficiency rates. Low numbers are good. Notice that there has been almost no change since mayoral control; some lines go up a tiny bit, some go down a bit, others waver back and forth a bit. Not a success story.”

To rectify the problem, Chancellor Rhee implemented the DCPS Effectiveness Assessment System for School-Based Personnel otherwise known as IMPACT.  Believing that DCPS’ failures rested largely with the teachers, Rhee implemented IMPACT in order to weed out the good from the bad.   Once done, she would shuffle the deck and place “highly effective” teachers  at more difficult schools. But as Brandenburg points out, “every single teacher remaining in DCPS has been repeatedly measured as effective or better. Yet the ratings for teachers at schools with high poverty rates remains much lower than those at schools with low poverty rates … these low-ranked teachers are not holdovers from the ‘bad old days’ – they are either brand-new hires or have been repeatedly measured as good or excellent under IMPACT.”

The report makes several recommendations, including that the city take a more coordinated approach to monitoring learning conditions in schools, such as school environment, discipline, and academic support, to better understand what progress is being made for students.

Mary Filardo executive director of the 21st Century School Fund was interviewed on the radio program, the Education Town Hall. No doubt, she has some recommendations of her own to share.  The episode can be found at this page –  http://educationtownhall.org/2015/06/10/mayoral-control/.  You must scroll down a little to find it.

 

Disparity in DC Public Schools

images-1Several conclusions have been brought to the public view to why students specifically in DC public schools are dropping out. This problem has become an obvious and almost unavoidable factor mainly in the districts public highs schools. The issue is disturbing and draws the attention of almost everyone, some who wish the crisis would fade, but perhaps the approach is what needs to be changed. Many have chosen elementary tactics to “handle” the problem, playing the blame
game, directing their attacks strictly to students and their guardians. While this may be true for some situations, not every case can be labeled as student or parent neglect. Many factors play a role in why students are being pushed away from educational institutions that have not yet been accounted for.

In order to correctly explain the problem the first thing that needs to be pointed out is that the statistics concerning dropout and suspension/expulsion rates, “disproportionately target students of color” (http://www.pbs.org). Based on studies from The Advancement Project, a human rights and civil rights organization, the ratio of black students’ likelihood of being suspended is 1:4 while the likelihood of their white counterparts being suspended is 1:20 (http://theadvancementproject.org). These rates create concerns surrounding what actually goes on in our school systems and what is causing mainly students of color to dropout. Some have credited this crisis to racial discrimination and there is evidence that supports that position. Standardized testing, suspensions for minor offenses and lack of interest on the schools behalf are some of the practices that reaffirm these claims. These practices cause a lack of community, creating an uncomfortable environment for students to engage in while weakening their chances of securing a safe and successful future for themselves.

A common term associated with discrimination within schools is the School to Prison Pipeline (STPP). The STPP is a system that pushes students away from school, into the many troubles of the world and eventually into jail. This has been an unsettled problem that has received little recognition therefore inadequate solutions for years. Our government puts a bigger investment in sending students to jail rather than sending them to school, spending almost four times as much money building new prisons to incarcerate our youth. The reason behind some of these suspensions, expulsions and arrests include playing music on phones, talking back to teachers, throwing temper tantrums and hugging friends (http://safequalityschools.org). Teachers and faculty are giving students of color student punishments that do not match the level of the offense. The repeat in suspensions and expulsions only take students out of the classroom leaving them further behind in their work. This creates a pattern. As teachers continue to suspend and expel students, they aren’t given the time to learn the material they missed in the classroom preventing them from being able to properly do their work.STPP This also aggravates them, eventually pushing them out of school and into the streets.

DC action for children has provided their reasons for why some students are excelling while others fail within a singular and supposedly equal learning system. They have contributed these achievement differences to “socioeconomic differences” or the gap between high and low-income families. (http://dcactionforchildren.org). Specifically regarding education, these socioeconomic differences determine the quality of education based on location and who attends the school. This plays into how money is dispersed throughout the several wards in the district and the schools in these neighborhoods. Students in wards 2 and 3 have much higher test scores than students in in wards 7 and 8, a reflection of the educational differences in these areas. High poverty neighborhoods, such as wards 7 and 8, are more likely to have under resourced schools contributing to the performance of the students that attend these schools. The “lack” of resources in schools, ranging from empty libraries to limited textbooks, makes it hard and sometimes impossible for students to maintain their studies causing them to feel school is a waste of time.

In addition to under funding and unjust punishments, students of color are also being pushed out of schools to maintain the reputation of standardized test scores. This goes against the second, sixth, seventh and twenty-sixth human right laws that secure equality despite skin color, the right to be treated equally by the law and the right to go to school (http://state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2008/108544.htm). Over the years different publications such as the New York Post and Teacher Revised have done research regarding the SAT and other official exams and how they are being portrayed as discriminatory. These assessments have been nicknamed “white preference tests.” According to the previously listed sources, the verbal section in the SAT is geared towards white middle class families, using experiences and vocabulary associated with that class. This makes it difficult for blacks and other minorities to relate to the passages or even know what the vocabulary used means. The SAT tests on subjects students have “a pre-existing knowledge” of, but if you are not a white middle class student, this information is not applicable. An example of these questions are typically found in the reading comprehension section says Jesse Scaccia of Teacher Revised. In this section you may find a passage or question with the word “equestrian”, horseback riding, something inner city youth have limited to no access to. Teacher revised faintly jokes at these unfair advantages in the SAT by providing alternate questions on topics like “reggeaton, the Yankees, what’s the hottest show on BET”, subjects a city kid could find relatable (teacherrevised.org).


stpp buttonBlacks have been required to reach a lower goal in taking standardized tests. Time Online newspaper has made note of Washington D.C’s announcement saying that while 68% of Whites and 82% of Asians must pass standardized math tests in order to secure the schools stability, only 45% of Black students were required to do the same. These numbers mean that while the bar is pushed higher for Whites and Asians, it is lowered for Blacks under circumstances that schools are fearful they will not reach the same level of academic success. Noliwe Rooks of Time says that these low standards will also become a factor in the education of black students “pushing them further behind” decreasing their level of intellect putting them at an unfair disadvantage from their schoolmates. This follows students into their adulthood as they begin to apply for jobs and find they don’t meet certain standards because of a lack of knowledge that was denied to them while in school. Decreasing the level of success required for certain students continues to show how unconcerned schools are with actually teaching and making sure each student reaches their full potential.


The discrimination in our school systems must be stopped to ensure each student is granted an equal opportunity to succeed within and beyond school walls. There is an absence of involvement and community within schools that is primarily disrupting the education of inner city students of color. This reduces how highly students may have seen themselves, making them feel that their appearance in school is optional and undervalued. The heads of schools must recognize the problems students of color face in school and choose to address them rather than ignore them or set rules and punishments that further cripple the student. As the problem grows we will find more students moving away from education entirely and minimizing their potential due to the lack of efforts of their educators. Racial discrimination in education is a growing epidemic that has effected and continues to affect the future of DCPS.

One Student’s Take On What Really Matters In DC Public Schools

I asked DC Public School graduate Quintess Bond why she thought DCPS test scores were so low? She presents her thesis in the form of this documentary. In it, Quintess explores the theory that good schools need active parents, engaged students and a dedicated faculty and administrative staff.  I think she puts a bit too much emphasis on the role of the parents but that can be forgiven. After suffering a stroke and losing her job, Quintess’ mother struggled mightily just to keep her daughter clothed, housed and fed. In addition, she insisted that Quintess stay on top of her school work. As a result, Quintess graduated salutatorian from School Without Walls in 2012.  School Without Walls is one of the highest performing high schools in the DC public school system.

Not many parents have the strength and determination that Quintess’ mother Pearl has. If they did, we might not need to worry about the school system at all.  Quintess’ documentary explores the theory that

Next week, Anaise Aritide will present her take on why there are such large disparities in DC public schools.