Call to Action: Help End Homelessness in DC

Still_Waiting_For_Housing_SignTell DC Council to Invest in the Programs that will End Homelessness for DC Residents!

Visit this link: http://bit.ly/10bBDQw

As part of the FY 2014 Budget Support Act (BSA), DC Mayor Vincent C. Gray has proposed significant changes to the Homeless Services Reform Act (HSRA), the law governing homeless services in DC. Not only will the proposed changes do little to resolve the crisis of family homelessness, but if enacted, could cause significant harm to homeless residents.

Nearly 200 DC organizations signed on to a letter to the Mayor asking him to withdraw these amendments from the BSA because they had not been vetted by stakeholders and because such significant changes deserve their own legislative process. Councilmember Graham is now leading the effort to remove these amendments (Subtitle D, The Homeless Services Reform Amendment Act of 2013) from the BSA and has introduced them as stand-alone legislation, which will give the public and stakeholders an opportunity for meaningful input.

As Fair Budget members, we know the best way to address homelessness is to ensure that housing is provided right now to DC residents experiencing homelessness,  not by implementing changes in the law that could negatively impact both families and individuals.

That’s why we want to tell the DC Council to invest in housing and to support Councilmember Graham’s efforts.

The solution is housing!  With a total investment of $8.5 million in the Housing First Program, $10.3 million in tenant-based Local Rent Supplement Program vouchers, we can end homelessness for 300 homeless families, for every DC senior, and for every resident with HIV/AIDS. And an investment of $5.1 million in supportive housing, shelter beds, and wrap-around services will help end homelessness for over 100 chronically homeless youth.

Go to this link to email the DC Council today!: http://bit.ly/10bBDQw

Then Join the Fair Budget Coalition at the following event:

The “ONE CITY NEEDS” Lobby Day Action
Wed, May 15TH
10:00am-12:00pm
At the Wilson Building
(1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW)

For more information please email: janelle@fairbudget.org or call 202-328-5513

$417 Million Surplus Could End Homelessness for Families Living In DC General

In it’s Fiscal Year 2014 Report, the Fair Budget Coalition has laid out a plan that would not only end homelessness for the nearly 300 families currently living in DC General but also people living with AIDS and Seniors.  The following video explains why DC’s City Council is unlikely to use any of the city’s $417 million surplus to implement this plan.  Spoiler alert:  It may have something to do with the Sustainable Capital Investment And Fund Balance Restoration Act Of 2010.

LONG LIVE ACTIVIST BRIAN ANDERS!

Brian Anders in 2011. Photo by Daniel del Pielago.

HEALTH CARE AND HOUSING FOR ALL!

By Kirby, longtime friend of Brian Anders

Longtime DC activist, Brian Anders, passed away in the early morning hours of Tuesday August 28, 2012. (Look for announcements for a speak-out/ memorial for this Thursday, prior to his memorial at Joseph’s House at 4pm). Brian was a devoted advocate on behalf of people experiencing homelessness in Washington, DC. He was one of the core members of Community for Creative Non Violence, including when it was at its most active in the 80s. CCNV was a vibrant community of anti-war and social justice activists, who succeeded, through direct action, in forcing the federal government to hand over the massive building at 2nd and D st. NW, so that CCNV could turn it into a shelter and community center for people without housing. The group also held dramatic actions at churches in the city, to get them to share space and resources with those who needed them most. Their organizing gained national momentum, and spurred passage of the McKinney–Vento Homeless Assistance Act, an important Federal bill that provides funding to programs to meet the needs of people experiencing homelessness. CCNV coupled their work to end homelessness with anti-war actions, always making the connection between the need to end imperialist war and suffering abroad, and to redirect those resources to helping those economically marginalized at home. While lacking its former community and activist spirit, the CCNV shelter still stands today. Brian went on to advocate for justice for low-income and marginalized communities in DC for the next decades.

Prior to his work with CCNV, Brian suffered PTSD as a result of serving in the military during the Vietnam war. He worked on healing throughout his life, channeling his energy into compassionate service and fiery advocacy. He was part of veterans’ peace organizations, and told me once that he spent months in prison in Texas for taking part in an action to block a weapons shipment. Over the decades, he worked at various organizations, helping get people into housing and helping people access needed services. He believed strongly in serving others in any way he could, in living in community, and in treating all people with dignity and respect. He had a healthy dose of disgust for politicians who rest in the pockets of the wealthy, and for the nonprofit industrial complex, which he understood to be wearing away at the true spirit of community and resistance in which many service providing organizations began.

Brain closely mentored young advocates, including members of a series of local groups who conducted direct actions to end homelessness, such as housing occupations, since the early 2000s. He was a down-to-earth human being, and he touched many lives. Brian apparently wanted people to memorialize him by taking action, speaking out on, standing up for justice and compassion. I hope we can honor his memory in this way.

Two excerpts from the Journal of Brian Anders, which he started writing in July 2012.

Page 1

Living in joy.  What exactly does that mean?
When do we ask the question what prevents us from living in joy?
Is it the need to blame others for our mistakes?  Is it the inability to learn from our mistakes or forgive ourselves for any pain we caused to them or others?  Could it be something as simple as being afraid to love ourselves?

Page. 5

Now is the time to be grateful and accepting of gifts I’m receiving from the divine.
What is self love?  What is the key to seeing oneself as worthy of being loved and giving love?  How- when can we learn self acceptance?  With all of our weaknesses?  How do we move past self hatred and learn to live in love?
Unconditional love?  Begins within not from outside of us.  Not looking for some religious answer, or even a scientific explanation or believe that it takes a form of trust.  Giving in to your higher self.  Ending the way within.

Another DC Budget Balanced on the Backs of the Poor?

Sam Ford Interviews Homeless for ABC 7

April 17, 2012, at his Ward 7 budget town hall meeting, Mayor Vince Gray said, “Just so people are clear. We’re not cutting those things. People will tell you anything. Sometimes they even think they’re right. We’re not cutting homeless services, we’re not cutting affordable housing, we’re not cutting Medicaid, we’re not cutting TANF (Temporary Aid to Needy Families) and we’re not cutting the Summer Youth Employment Program.” Despite this, advocates for social services and affordable housing programs, like the Fair Budget Coalition who’ve been organizing around these issues, will assure you that the mayor’s proposed budget will in no way meet the growing need of DC’s low- and even moderate-income residents in these difficult economic times. In particular, the homeless families living in DC General, whose numbers continue to grow, do not believe maintaining an increasingly tenuous status quo represents their needs or wishes as taxpaying citizens of the District of Columbia. These families made their feelings known at the DC City Council Budget Hearing on April 30, 2012. Only two elected officials, Council Chair Kwame Brown and Ward 8 Councilmember Marion Barry were present at the hearing. ABC 7’s Sam Ford and the Washington Times’ Andrew Harnick covered the story.

The above videos make clear that DC’s safety net isn’t meeting the needs of many of our residents, but given the time constraints of a local news broadcast, it doesn’t go into much depth. For more insight, it doesn’t hurt to follow the analysis of folks like Howard University professor David Schwartzman, who routinely follows the DC budget.

Cross-posted from The Mail @ DC Watch written by David Schwartzman

Our Mayor proposes another DC budget balanced on the backs of the poor; should we be surprised? On April 20, we learned that our former mayor, Anthony Williams, has been appointed as Chief Executive of the Federal City Council, the leading local think tank of the 1 percent, or is it the 0.1 percent? (Note that Frank Keating, the former Republican governor of Oklahoma and now president and CEO of the American Bankers Association, is the FCC president). Anthony Williams served on Mayor Gray’s transition team and was also just appointed to head the new Tax Revision Commission. As CFO of the Control Board, Anthony Williams was a key architect of the Urban Structural Adjustment Program that balanced our budget on the backs of our poor, while favoring the wealthy with tax cuts (the Tax Parity Act). The Control Board regime closed DC General Hospital, privatized municipal functions, cut the so-called safety net, and increased our income gap to record levels, while setting the course for Mayor Fenty’s agenda that brought this assault on our working and middle class majority to a new level. And Mayor Gray has not unexpectedly continued along the same road.

While our mayor and council deserve credit for their liberal policies regarding sexual orientation and immigrants rights, their economic and public education policies should brand them as Republicans posing as Democrats. For example, our mayor just endorsed new DCPS school closings based on an IFF study funded by the Walton Foundation (Walmart), opening up new opportunities for the semi-privatization of public education. Colbert King just characterized conservative Democrats one hundred years ago as favoring “the wealthy, to whom much has been given, have no stake in anybody else’s success,” http://tinyurl.com/6twrwpf, an apt description of most of our local Democratic elected officials, and of course the Republican posing as an Independent, David Catania. When will these Democrats follow President Obama’s example by at least claiming to go on an “Offense Over Taxes on the Wealthy,” a headline from the New York Times?

Now to address the DC budget process. For FY 2013, Mayor Gray has proposed even more hurtful budget cuts in low income programs, amounting to roughly seventy million dollars, which include programs involving health care coverage for low income residents, affordable housing, homeless services. and cash assistance for families with children (for details go to http://www.dcfpi.org). This proposal comes on top of $239 million already cut from low income programs since 2008, according to the DC Fiscal Policy Institute’s budget data. And while the mayor and the council squabble about where to spend the $79 million surplus, specifically whether to pay back city employees for their four-day furlough taken at the beginning of 2011, the elephant sitting in the Wilson Building remains unnoticed, the under-taxed, now growing income of the top 5 percent of DC residents, whose family income is above $250,000 per year (note too that the furlough subtracted four days of pay from all affected, hence putting the greatest burden on the lowest paid employees). After the small tax hike on the wealthy passed last year, no one on the council is talking yet about another hike. Unless challenged by a relentless lobby, they will go ahead and pass another austerity budget, once again balancing it on the backs of the poor and near poor, including the former middle class. According to Tavis Smiley and Cornel West in “The Rich and the Rest of Us: A Poverty Manifesto,” 150 million, or nearly half, of Americans are either poor or near poor, suffering from the lack of income security. In DC more than a majority of residents fall in that category. Fifty percent of DC’s Black children are living in poverty. Meanwhile the Washington Post tells us that the 1 percent are doing better than ever, with their minimum household income being $617,000. (Note: this minimum is lower than the ITEP minimum of $1.5 million for the top 1 percent of District families, excluding the elderly because the Census figures the Post relied on are underestimating the real income because of tax avoidance.)

Here are the latest DC tax statistics, updated by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP): the top 1 percent of DC families, with three million dollars of million income now pay a lower DC tax rate (6.1 percent) than the bottom 20 percent with $12,400 annual income (7.0 percent), while the working/middle class pays 9 to 10 percent, taking into account the federal deduction benefit, mostly helping the upper income families, restoring some of the money spent for their DC taxes. Yes, the total DC tax burden of the top 1 percent is now even lower than before the small hike on incremental income above $350,000 passed last year. According to ITEP, the very wealthy across the nation have found even more ways to hide their income from taxation.

There is an alternative: hike the overall tax burden of wealthy residents by no more than two cents on the dollar of family income, yielding two hundred million dollars a year in additional revenue, while at the same time tax relief for our low income and middle class residents could be provided, e.g., by coupling the District income tax deduction and exemption with the federal rates. The increased revenue should be targeted by legislation to restoring and expanding the gutted programs that serve low income residents, especially for affordable housing and income security (TANF and its supports that facilitate entry into the workforce earning living wages). And any budget surplus should likewise be targeted to restoring these programs. More badly needed revenue should come from curbing corporate welfare including unjustified tax abatements and subsidies, our mayor and council campaigning for PILOTS, payments in lieu of taxes from the World Bank, IMF, Fannie Mae, as well as making PEPCO pay its DC taxes and taking immediate steps to establish a DC Public Bank, investing our taxes into green economic development, living-wage jobs, and affordable housing. For more on the District government’s record since 2008, check out the Report on the State of Human Rights in DC: http://afsc.org/resource/report-state-human-rights-dc.

Occupy DC Weighs In On Franklin Shelter

Free Franklin Activists Hang Banner From Franklin School

Free Franklin Activists Hang Banner From Franklin School

At 2:00 PM on Saturday, November 19, 2011, a small group of activists associated with Occupy DC took over the vacant Franklin School building at 13th and K Streets NW, Washington, DC.  Their occupation did not last long as the police arrested eleven activists around 7:00PM that same evening. The activists call themselves Free Franklin. They’re goals, motivations and calls to action are posted at FreeFranlkinDC.blogspot.com. A public forum about the future of Franklin Shelter and the importance of public property for essential human services is scheduled as follows:

Public Forum on Franklin Shelter
Monday, November 21
6:30 PM – 8:30 PM
Asbury United Methodist Church
11th & K Streets NW

All DC community members are encouraged to attend.  For more on the November 19 takeover of Franklin School I suggest Luke’s post at DC’s Independent Media Center.

The recent history of Franklin School illustrates the conflict between the needs of long-term DC residents and the actions of District government who, more often than not, represent the interests of developers and the wealthy over those of low and moderate-income residents.  Since the Fenty Administration, the government of the District of Columbia has been attempting to declare Franklin School surplus and sell it to a private entity, this despite the school’s long history of public service.  One of DC’s first public high schools, the building was used as an educational facility for most of its life.  Up until 1995 the Franklin School housed an adult-education center, at which time it was closed for renovations that the city promised but (surprise, surprise) never materialized. The school remained shuttered until 2002 when homeless advocates took over the building and turned it into a shelter. By 2007, the Franklin Shelter was housing 300, working, homeless men.  In 2008, then Mayor Adrian Fenty shuttered Franklin Shelter ignoring emergency legislation passed by the council to keep it open, Franklin Shelter Closing Requirements Emergency Act of 2008.   After more than two years in the courts, a lawsuit brought by the Committee to Save Franklin Shelter and former residents finally failed in January of 2011.   Despite this, homeless advocates continue to challenge the closing of  DC’s homeless shelters in the courts.  More information about their efforts can be found at FranklinShelter.org.

Except for its brief re-opening on November 19, the Franklin School has remained empty since September  2008.  Homeless advocates would like to reopen it as a shelter.  Others interested in the property as a historical landmark and District treasure such as the Coalition for Franklin School would like to see it reopened as a school or some other educational or cultural institution.  The city seems most inclined to sell the property to private developers interested in turning the Franklin School into a boutique hotel.  In accordance with District of Columbia Code 10-801, DC government is not allowed to surplus and sell any property without first conducting a pubilc hearing and soliciting input from the community. Unfortunately, as the above video of the surplus hearing for Franklin School conducted on November 18, 2010 demonstrates, these hearings are far too often used as a forum for city officials to present to the community their reasons for a decision that they’ve already made, rather than a hearing in which public comment is genuinely considered.  Is the surplus of Franklin School a foregone conclusion?  Stay tuned.