Common Security Clubs Come to DC

A small group approach to building resilient communities in DC during tough times. . . . → Read More: Common Security Clubs Come to DC

Divided Congress, Divided Nation

Joint Session of Congress

And so it begins. It’s a new year and we have a new congress. Unfortunately the 112th promises to be as divisive as any session before it. Can we expect better? Unlikely. So far, House Republicans who align themselves with Tea Party activism have promised to either repeal Obama’s health insurance reform or refuse to fund it. They are also planning to cut $100 billion worth of domestic spending from the budget in an effort to bring down the deficit but have no intention of raising taxes, this despite the fact that tax rates for all income levels have reached lows that we haven’t seen since the 1950s. My personal favorite is the promise to read the Constitution aloud on the House floor as a reminder to elected officials of the Founder’s rules regarding limited-government. I’m not certain those rules are as explicit as conservatives think, what with a preamble that charges the government with such broad authority as promoting the general welfare and securing the blessings of liberty, but that may be a matter of interpretation.

Does a rejection of health care reform (well, health insurance reform) and deficit reduction without raising revenue represent a mandate that the electorate demanded when they voted the Democrats out of the majority last November? Should we thank the Tea Party that isn’t really a party for this? Will they be happy with the results?

I suspect that Tea Party activists may be no happier about the results of the 112th Congress as the New Left, energized by Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, was with the 110th or even the 111th Congress. I say this because all of the hip hip hoorays that are chanted when we’re in office and they are out (it doesn’t matter if the “we” here is the Left or the Right) inevitably turns into the same sorry refrain, a refrain that goes something like, “Hold the phone there partner, that’s not what we asked you to do.”

Two years ago, the Left made it clear that we wanted, among other things, health care reform and an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. What we got was health insurance reform and although we’ve pulled back to a certain extent in Iraq, there can be no doubt that a US military presence will remain in both Iraq and Afghanistan for a long, long time. Last year, when the Right demanded that elected officials stop spending beyond our means, as so many of us have been forced to do in these hard economic times, were they expecting cuts to unemployment and food stamps? According to the latest 60 Minutes/Vanity Fair poll, 61 percent of Americans favor increasing taxes on the wealthy as a way to reduce the deficit while 20 percent prefer cuts to the Defense Department. If we extrapolate those poll numbers, less than 20 percent of the American public has any interest in cutting entitlement programs or social services. [It’s actually much less than that if you read the poll carefully.] Given the choice to increase taxes on the wealthy or increase cuts to programs that benefit the poor and middle class, what do you think the 112th Congress will do?

Behind all of the complaints that we threw the bastards out and the new bastards aren’t any better is one inescapable reality. The new bastards and the old bastards have more in common with each other than they do with any of us.

The nation is divided, perhaps as divided as the Congress. We are divided by race; we are divided by political ideology; we pretend not to be divided by class, but in reality that is probably our most potent divide. To the never ending advantage of the elites in power, the electorate will forever blow out of proportion all the little things that make us different and ignore the issues in which we should be able to find common ground.

Audio Archive from Rallies to Restore Honor and Reclaim the Dream

Riley Abbott’s report on Glenn Beck’s controversial Rally to Restore Honor and Al Sharpton’s response The Rally to Reclaim the Dream makes it clear that in fact there are a number of things upon which the Right and the Left agree. It also points out that neither side seems aware of this reality.

Audio Report from One Nation Rally

Alyssa Schimmel’s report on last October’s One Nation March highlights the demands the Left expected the Democratic Majority . . . → Read More: Divided Congress, Divided Nation

A Day for The Children of Incarcerated Parents and Those At Risk

5th Annual Concerned Fathers Public Safety Community Event was organized by Family and Friends of Incarcerated People, Saturday, August 14, 2010 . . . → Read More: A Day for The Children of Incarcerated Parents and Those At Risk

Covering Education: Tucker vs Nnamdi

Having had parents who put a premium on education and having a daughter myself who is in DCPS, I try to follow what’s going on with the public schools. I have to admit being greatly disappointed every time Michelle Rhee makes an appearance on WAMU’s Kojo Nnamdi show. She was on again this last Friday August 28, 2010. You can find a copy of the transcript at the following link – http://thekojonnamdishow.org/shows/2010-08-27/politics-hour. A lot of what she says sounds great, but if you’re looking for specifics, you have to wait for a knowledgeable listener to make it on the air with a question.

Michelle Rhee’s Great Disapearing Act

For example, when Rhee was asked what she would do to improve special education in DCPS she gave a two paragraph answer, but the only specifics she gave came in these two sentences: “We spend upwards of $90 million a year transporting our students to a lot of private schools throughout the region. And we really need to look at what we’re doing to build the capacity within DCPS to serve a lot of those students better, so that they can attend their neighborhood schools.” So hopefully, Rhee is gonna ask her people to “look at what they’re doing,” with regard to special education. That’s reassuring, I guess.

Another caller asked about the drop in AYP test scores, which much of her reform was designed to improve. Rhee said that despite the fact that test scores have dropped, the huge gap between black and white student achievement has narrowed, has in fact narrowed significantly at the secondary level. But after looking at the statistics provided by Epsilon, the caller who posed the test score question, I’m wondering how she defines significant. According to Epsilon, “the most recent scores that came out for AYP shows that 88 percent of the schools in Ward 3 made AYP while 86 percent of the schools in Ward 8 failed. The achievements gap between blacks and whites is even more telling. The lowest achievement level for whites is at Watkins on Capitol Hill, which was 83.78 percent and then it goes up to 95.69 percent at Murch. While in Ward 8, we have Stanton School with the achievement of black — I mean, the achievement level for blacks is 12.72 percent. At Terrell, it’s 28.23 percent. At Savoy, a brand-new school, is 21.62 percent.”

I’m wondering how bad the gap was before the “significant” improvement. I also wonder if the gap wouldn’t have narrowed further and perhaps without the pain of school closings and teacher firings if Michelle Rhee and the Fenty Administration had taken a look at the funding gap between low-income schools and wealthier schools. I know that schools in DC are funded on a per pupil basis, but some pupils cost more to educate than others. No doubt, a look at the individual school budgets will verify this. Special education and special needs students, as Rhee herself seems to be aware, cost the city a significant amount of money in transportation alone. So what does it mean when these students attend low-income schools at a higher rate than wealthier schools? As far as I know, DC public schools don’t get more money for students that require specialized instruction.

How the city deals with special education students isn’t the only thing that contributes to the achievement gap between black and white students, but it is one thing that Rhee doesn’t seem to know a whole lot about. What else is she missing? Kojo Nnamdi and his guest analyst Tom Sherwood seemed more concerned about whether or not Rhee would stay on the job if Mayor Fenty loses his re-election bid. (Sounds like the answer is no by the way.) Neither of them questioned her about the controversies at Bruce Monroe or Hardy Elementary Schools. They praised the physical renovations taking place in schools on Capital Hill, but no mention was made of other schools, like Parkview Elementary (which currently houses students from the recently demolished Bruce Monroe) continue to deal with rodent infestations in the food supply. Rhee’s answers sounded like those of a politician, rather than an educational professional with an intricate understanding of the system she hopes to reform.

On the other hand, if you do in fact want to hear an educational professional willing to give detailed analysis and an honest assessment of the DC public school system, the place to turn would have to be WPFW. Reporter Pete Tucker . . . → Read More: Covering Education: Tucker vs Nnamdi

A Brief Audio Archive of the Tent City Protest

Tent City Protest at 7th & R Streets NW

On July 10, 2010 ONE DC and Take Back The Land set up a tent city at 7th and R Streets NW to protest the unfulfilled promises made by Mayor Fenty regarding the public property there, otherwise known as Parcel 42. The tent city got a fair amount of media attention at the start, but interest waned as the protest failed to move the Fenty Administration to action, beyond posting the sign in the picture of course. The sign, which reads, “Another Project from the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development,” sounds like Mayor Fenty is taking credit for the tent city. In a way, that’s accurate. If Fenty had followed through on the Memorandum of Understanding that he signed in 2007, then a tent city on that lot wouldn’t have been necessary.

The Grassroots Media Project’s radio production class gathered audio at tent city near the end of July. Interviews were conducted by Candace Wolfe, Navid Nasr, Crystal Elekwachi and Riley Abbott. The final piece was edited together by Riley Abbot.

A Brief Audio Archive of the Tent City Protest Tent City Protest at 7th & R Streets NW

Additionally, Eric Sheptock’s blog posts on the subject give you the perspective of a tent city resident. It’s also interesting to compare coverage by the City Paper, which focuses on whether or not the activists would achieve their goals, with coverage in the Afro American, which is more concerned with how affordable housing is defined by the city and why their definition is problematic.