An Increase in Rent for DC’s Poorest Residents

This post has two features. The first is the latest edition of We Act Radio’s Live Wire program, The Empower DC Community Hour, which airs on Monday evenings from 7:00 – 8:00 PM. This week’s show was hosted by Empower DC Afforadable Housing Organizer Linda Leaks and focused on recent proposals by Congress and the Obama Administration to raise the minimum rent that section-8 housing voucher holders are required to pay. This weeks guests were Venus Little from the Task Force to Oppose the Minimum Rent Increase and Diane Hunter from the Perry School Community Service Center, Inc. Please listen and support the show.

[haiku url=”http://www.grassrootsmediaproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Live-Wire-EDC-Community-Hour-3-5-12.wav” title=”The Empower DC Community Hour for March 5, 2012″]

Empower DC Community Education Event

This second is a cross-post from Kathy Baer’s really informative blog Poverty & Policy, from which I took the title of this post:

What Would HUD’s Proposed Minimum Rent Mandate Mean for Extremely Poor DC Residents? Researching the impacts of the mandatory minimum rent proposal in the President’s Fiscal Year 2013 budget, I asked myself what it would mean for extremely low-income District residents who benefit from the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s rental housing programs.

The answer, I think, is maybe less than for the poorest beneficiaries in most of the country. But it’s hard to be sure because we don’t know how broadly HUD would apply the new policy.

Here’s what we do know.

DCHA (the District’s public housing authority) doesn’t impose a minimum rent, as it could under the current law. It’s chosen — wisely I think — to let the lowest of low-income households conserve their cash for other needs.

These, recall, are households whose adjusted incomes are so low that the usual 30% they’d owe for rent is negligible, except to them.

In one scenario, they’d have to pay $75 a month, as would more than half a million of the poorest households nationwide, though DCHA could grant hardship exemptions for some of them.

But DCHA is one of the 34 public housing authorities that participate in HUD’s Moving to Work demonstration project. As such, it’s exempt from many of the rules most PHAs must comply with.

So it’s possible that DCHA could preserve its current rent policy for most residents who’d otherwise be affected.

According to DCHA’s latest annual report, 12,752 individuals and families had Housing Choice vouchers in its MTW program. It plans to increase the number to 12,784 by the end of this fiscal year.

DCHA says that close to 20,000 additional residents live in public housing units.

If the proposed policy change is like the one in a bill the House is considering — and it does seem that way — then the minimum mandatory rent wouldn’t automatically apply to either the voucher holders or the public housing residents.

Or so I gather from a bill analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

But the minimum mandatory would apply to residents of project-based Section 8 housing, i.e., units that have federally-funded vouchers attached to them.

That, says CBPP, would put 1,273 extremely low-income District households at risk of “serious hardship and even homelessness.”

Do we really need anything more to push up our homelessness rates?

Eleven Things You Should Know About “Debt Ceiling” Deal

(Cross-posted from Linda Leaks in Taking Action, Empower DC Newsletter Summer 2011)

THE DEAL, agreed to by the United States Congress, (House of Representatives and Senate), and the President of the United States, Barack Obama, is officially named The Budget Control Act of 2011, signed into law on August 2, 2011; THE DEAL prevents the federal government from defaulting on its debt/bills/credit. THE DEAL permits the debt ceiling (borrowing authority) to be raised by a $2.2 trillion increase which equals a total debt limit of $14.3 trillion; THE DEAL requires spending cuts to be made in two stages: First set of cuts to occur immediately and the Second set of cuts by December, 2011; THE DEAL requires the Appropriations Committee to immediately begin making $917 billion in spending cuts to the discretionary budget; THE DEAL calls for spending cuts to the federal discretionary budget up to $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years; THE DEAL calls for immediate spending cuts of $25 billion to the fiscal year 2012 which begins October 1, 2011, and $47 billion in fiscal year 2013 which begins October 1, 2012 and escalating increases thereafter; THE DEAL requires the establishment of a 12-member bipartisan committee with the responsibility of coming up with a list (recommendations) of an additional $1.5 trillion in spending cuts from the federal budget by November 23, 2011, including entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security; The Committee is called the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, nicknamed the Super Committee; THE DEAL does not represent a balanced approach to long-term deficit reduction – THE DEAL takes revenue increases and Bush- era tax breaks for the wealthy off the table, and doesn’t even consider closing corporation tax loopholes or ending or even “drawing down” troops from Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.; THE DEAL makes harmful spending cuts to affordable housing, among other safety net programs, including project-based section 8, housing vouchers, and public housing. These deep spending cuts will most likely increase homelessness for the most vulnerable people regardless of age, family composition or physical conditions; Details of the spending bills for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (facing a $5 billion cut) and other agencies, will most likely be released in September, when Congress returns from recess. TAKE ACTION: Fight for Housing

Call your Congress member at 202-224-3121: (also have your relatives and friends call ); Tell your Congressional Representative:

To take a fair approach to the budget crisis and don’t just cut spending but also, increase revenues by closing tax loopholes and require wealthy Americans and corporations to pay their share; End the wars that the United States is involved in – Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, others; Join with other tenants, both locally and nationally, and FIGHT FOR YOUR HOUSING; Debt Crisis: Terms of Empowerment Appropriation Committee: A Congressional Committee. Among other responsibilities, approves federal funds to be disbursed through a variety of government organizations, agencies and departments, such as Housing and Urban Development (HUD); Bills: A statement of money owed for goods or services; A proposed law presented to a legislature, but not yet enacted or passed and made law. Debt Ceiling: The maximum borrowing power of a governmental entity; Debt: A liability or obligation to pay; Default: failure to meet financial obligations; Discretionary Budget is the federal government spending that is negotiated between the President and Congress each year. It includes everything that is not in the mandatory budget, which are programs required by law to provide certain benefits, such as Social Security and Medicare.

Maturing Mortgages. Sounds Like A Good Thing, Right?

For the homeowner who’s been beholden to the bank for 30 years, finally paying off that mortgage is definitely a good thing. But when a landlord who has a contract with HUD to provide affordable apartments, pays off his or her debt to the bank, not everybody wins.

Everybody knows that DC has an affordable housing crisis. One source of housing for moderate and low-income residents of Washington, DC has been apartments regulated by the department of Housing and Urban Development. DC residents whose income is less than the median of $57,936 have turned to HUD for rent subsidized apartments. Property owners, looking for a good deal on a multifamily unit have bought these buildings at reduced rates. In exchange, they made the apartments available to residents receiving rental assistance. That arrangement stands for as long as the mortgage on the property is still in service, but once the building belongs to the landlord outright, he or she can do whatever they want with it. So, where does that leave the residents who live in the property?

Empower DC’s Linda Leaks is educating tenants who live in HUD properties whose mortgages are on the verge of expiration about their rights, and lobbying Congress to implement legislation that would safeguard low- and moderate-income tenants. WPFW reporter Peter Tucker interviewed her on the steps of the U.S. Capitol. It’s another story that you won’t hear on the nightly news or even read about in the Washington Post, but we have it here. A Massive Maturing of Mortgages [audio:http://www.grassrootsdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Linda-Leaks-6-13-101.mp3]