Divided Congress, Divided Nation

Joint Session of Congress

And so it begins. It’s a new year and we have a new congress. Unfortunately the 112th promises to be as divisive as any session before it. Can we expect better? Unlikely. So far, House Republicans who align themselves with Tea Party activism have promised to either repeal Obama’s health insurance reform or refuse to fund it. They are also planning to cut $100 billion worth of domestic spending from the budget in an effort to bring down the deficit but have no intention of raising taxes, this despite the fact that tax rates for all income levels have reached lows that we haven’t seen since the 1950s. My personal favorite is the promise to read the Constitution aloud on the House floor as a reminder to elected officials of the Founder’s rules regarding limited-government. I’m not certain those rules are as explicit as conservatives think, what with a preamble that charges the government with such broad authority as promoting the general welfare and securing the blessings of liberty, but that may be a matter of interpretation.

Does a rejection of health care reform (well, health insurance reform) and deficit reduction without raising revenue represent a mandate that the electorate demanded when they voted the Democrats out of the majority last November? Should we thank the Tea Party that isn’t really a party for this? Will they be happy with the results?

I suspect that Tea Party activists may be no happier about the results of the 112th Congress as the New Left, energized by Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, was with the 110th or even the 111th Congress. I say this because all of the hip hip hoorays that are chanted when we’re in office and they are out (it doesn’t matter if the “we” here is the Left or the Right) inevitably turns into the same sorry refrain, a refrain that goes something like, “Hold the phone there partner, that’s not what we asked you to do.”

Two years ago, the Left made it clear that we wanted, among other things, health care reform and an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. What we got was health insurance reform and although we’ve pulled back to a certain extent in Iraq, there can be no doubt that a US military presence will remain in both Iraq and Afghanistan for a long, long time. Last year, when the Right demanded that elected officials stop spending beyond our means, as so many of us have been forced to do in these hard economic times, were they expecting cuts to unemployment and food stamps? According to the latest 60 Minutes/Vanity Fair poll, 61 percent of Americans favor increasing taxes on the wealthy as a way to reduce the deficit while 20 percent prefer cuts to the Defense Department. If we extrapolate those poll numbers, less than 20 percent of the American public has any interest in cutting entitlement programs or social services. [It’s actually much less than that if you read the poll carefully.] Given the choice to increase taxes on the wealthy or increase cuts to programs that benefit the poor and middle class, what do you think the 112th Congress will do?

Behind all of the complaints that we threw the bastards out and the new bastards aren’t any better is one inescapable reality. The new bastards and the old bastards have more in common with each other than they do with any of us.

The nation is divided, perhaps as divided as the Congress. We are divided by race; we are divided by political ideology; we pretend not to be divided by class, but in reality that is probably our most potent divide. To the never ending advantage of the elites in power, the electorate will forever blow out of proportion all the little things that make us different and ignore the issues in which we should be able to find common ground.

Audio Archive from Rallies to Restore Honor and Reclaim the Dream

Riley Abbott’s report on Glenn Beck’s controversial Rally to Restore Honor and Al Sharpton’s response The Rally to Reclaim the Dream makes it clear that in fact there are a number of things upon which the Right and the Left agree. It also points out that neither side seems aware of this reality.

Audio Report from One Nation Rally

Alyssa Schimmel’s report on last October’s One Nation March highlights the demands the Left expected the Democratic Majority . . . → Read More: Divided Congress, Divided Nation

A Brief Audio Archive of the Tent City Protest

Tent City Protest at 7th & R Streets NW

On July 10, 2010 ONE DC and Take Back The Land set up a tent city at 7th and R Streets NW to protest the unfulfilled promises made by Mayor Fenty regarding the public property there, otherwise known as Parcel 42. The tent city got a fair amount of media attention at the start, but interest waned as the protest failed to move the Fenty Administration to action, beyond posting the sign in the picture of course. The sign, which reads, “Another Project from the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development,” sounds like Mayor Fenty is taking credit for the tent city. In a way, that’s accurate. If Fenty had followed through on the Memorandum of Understanding that he signed in 2007, then a tent city on that lot wouldn’t have been necessary.

The Grassroots Media Project’s radio production class gathered audio at tent city near the end of July. Interviews were conducted by Candace Wolfe, Navid Nasr, Crystal Elekwachi and Riley Abbott. The final piece was edited together by Riley Abbot.

A Brief Audio Archive of the Tent City Protest Tent City Protest at 7th & R Streets NW

Additionally, Eric Sheptock’s blog posts on the subject give you the perspective of a tent city resident. It’s also interesting to compare coverage by the City Paper, which focuses on whether or not the activists would achieve their goals, with coverage in the Afro American, which is more concerned with how affordable housing is defined by the city and why their definition is problematic.